Key result
Serelaxin induced similar dyspnoea relief by VAS-AUC through Day 5 in acute heart failure patients with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction.
Why the study?
Does serelaxin improve dyspnoea and clinical outcomes similarly in acute heart failure patients with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction?
RCT (n=1,161)
Does serelaxin improve dyspnoea and clinical outcomes similarly in acute heart failure patients with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction?
Serelaxin is equally effective and well-tolerated for dyspnoea relief and clinical outcomes in acute heart failure patients regardless of whether they have preserved or reduced ejection fraction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports serelaxin for acute dyspnoea relief irrespective of ejection fraction; confirms consistent efficacy across HFpEF and HFrEF.
AIMS: Serelaxin is effective in relieving dyspnoea and improving multiple outcomes in acute heart failure (AHF). Many AHF patients have preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Given the lack of evidence-based therapies in this population, we evaluated the effects of serelaxin according to EF in RELAX-AHF trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: RELAX-AHF randomized 1161 AHF patients to 48-h serelaxin (30 μg/kg/day) or placebo within 16 h from presentation. We compared the effects of serelaxin on efficacy endpoints, safety endpoints, and biomarkers of organ damage between preserved (≥50%) and reduced (<50%, HFrEF) EF. HFpEF was present in 26% of patients. Serelaxin induced a similar dyspnoea relief in HFpEF vs. HFrEF patients by visual analogue scale-area under the curve (VAS-AUC) through Day 5 [mean change, 461 (-195, 1117) vs. 397 (10, 783) mm h, P = 0.87], but had possibly different effects on the proportion of patients with moderately or markedly dyspnoea improvement by Likert scale at 6, 12, and 24 h [odds ratio for favourable response, 1.70 (0.98, 2.95) vs. 0.85 (0.62, 1.15), interaction P = 0.030]. No differences were encountered in the effect of serelaxin on short- or long-term outcome between HFpEF and HFrEF patients including cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart/renal failure through Day 60, cardiovascular death through Day 180, and all-cause death through Day 180. Similar safety and changes in biomarkers (high-sensitivity troponin T, cystatin-C, and alanine/aspartate aminotransferases) were found in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In AHF patients with HFpEF compared with those with HFrEF, serelaxin was well tolerated and effective in relieving dyspnoea and had a similar effect on short- and long-term outcome, including survival improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Filippatos et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Acute heart failure (AHF) (n=1,161). Serelaxin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Dyspnoea relief by visual analogue scale-area under the curve (VAS-AUC) through Day 5 (p=0.87). Serelaxin induced similar dyspnoea relief by VAS-AUC through Day 5 in acute heart failure patients with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: