Key result
A 54-year-old male without atherosclerosis successfully underwent coronary stenting for an exercise-induced spontaneous left anterior descending artery dissection.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) should be considered in the differential diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome even in males over 40 without coronary risk factors following intense exercise.
Supports feasibility of stenting in exercise-induced SCAD without atherosclerosis; leaves open need for dedicated trials in this demographic.
Introduction: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an unusual cause of chest pain most often presenting in peripartum or postpartum women. The SCAD precipitated by exercise in patients without underlying atherosclerosis is very rare and has been described in literature only on a few occasions. It has never been described in a male above the age of 40. Case Report: We present the case of a 54-year-old male presented with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction having suffered a left anterior descending artery dissection following an intense gym workout. He was successfully managed with coronary stenting. The patient suffered from on-going chest pain after initial recovery and was investigated with CT coronary angiography to assess stent patency and for evidence of underlying coronary artery disease. This showed a calcium score of 0 and no evidence of underlying atherosclerosis with a patent stent. Conclusion: In conclusion, SCAD should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome, even those without coronary risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellis et al. (2016) conducted a case report in Exercise-induced spontaneous coronary artery dissection (n=1). Coronary stenting was evaluated. A 54-year-old male without atherosclerosis successfully underwent coronary stenting for an exercise-induced spontaneous left anterior descending artery dissection.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: