Key result
Pharmacist-managed warfarin boosts TTR to ~97% vs standard care in mechanical mitral valve patients.
Why the study?
Despite long-standing use of warfarin in patients with mechanical mitral valve prostheses, serious complications and economic burden persist, prompting evaluation of pharmacist-managed therapy in Egypt.
Does pharmacist-managed warfarin therapy improve percentage time in the therapeutic range in patients with mechanical mitral valve prostheses compared to standard care?
RCT (n=59)
Randomized
No
Does pharmacist-managed warfarin therapy improve percentage time in the therapeutic range in patients with mechanical mitral valve prostheses compared to standard care?
Pharmacist-managed warfarin therapy is a cost-saving strategy that improves anticoagulation control in patients with mechanical mitral valve prostheses.
Supports pharmacist-managed warfarin in mechanical mitral valve patients; extends RCT evidence beyond general populations.
Background: Despite warfarin therapy had been used for decades for patients with mechanical mitral valve prostheses (MMVPs), serious and life-threatening complications are still reported worldwide with a significant economic burden. This study is aimed at assessing the clinical and the cost-effectiveness of adopting pharmacist-managed warfarin therapy (PMWT) services for optimizing warfarin treatment in Egypt. Methods: A prospective randomized trial in which 59 patients with MMVPs were randomly assigned to receive the PMWT services or the standard care and followed up for 1 year. The primary outcome was percentage time in the therapeutic range (TTR). For the cost-effectiveness analysis, a Markov cohort process model with nine mutually exclusive health states was developed from a medical provider's perspective. A lifetime horizon was applied. All costs and outcomes were discounted at 3.5% annually. For the cost-effectiveness analysis, the total cumulative quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and total costs per patient were 21.53 and 10.43; 436.38 and 1,242.25 United States dollar (USD) in the intervention and the control groups, respectively, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of -72.5796 for the intervention group. Conclusion: The PMWT strategy was proven to provide a significantly better anticoagulation control and to be a cost-saving approach in Egyptian patients with MMVPs. Nevertheless, the dominance of this strategy is sustained by maintaining the therapeutic International Normalized Ratio (INR) control within the recommended range. Our findings will benefit Egyptian policy-makers who may seek novel health strategies for better resource allocation. Clinical Trial Registration: [ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT04409613].
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Batran et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Mechanical mitral valve prostheses requiring warfarin therapy (n=59). Pharmacist-managed warfarin therapy (PMWT) vs. Standard medical care was evaluated on Percentage time in the therapeutic range (TTR) (p=0.008). Pharmacist-managed warfarin therapy significantly increased the median time in therapeutic range to 96.8% compared to 73.1% with standard care (p=0.008) in patients with mechanical mitral valve prostheses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: