Key result
Pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service for patients on warfarin is a dominant strategy compared to usual medical care, increasing the probability of well-controlled INR by 0.154 while reducing costs by 374.51 RSD per patient.
Why the study?
Does Pharmacist-Managed Anticoagulation Service improve cost-effectiveness and INR control in patients on warfarin compared to usual medical care?
Does Pharmacist-Managed Anticoagulation Service improve cost-effectiveness and INR control in patients on warfarin compared to usual medical care?
Effect estimate: Dominant strategy
Absolute Event Rate: 0.721% vs 0.567%
Pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service for patients on warfarin is a cost-effective, dominant strategy compared to usual medical care in Serbia, projecting significant healthcare savings.
Should not yet change warfarin practice; hypothesis-generating for pharmacist-managed services pending randomized confirmation.
It has been determined that Pharmacist-Managed Anticoagulation Service (PMAS) for patients on warfarin improves anticoagulation control and decreases the rate of bleeding, thus reducing the overall health care costs. This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness of providing pharmaceutical care (PC) and usual medical care (UMC) to patients on warfarin, from the perspective of the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) in Serbia. The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted, with a time horizon of 10 days. Decision tree modeling combined data on efficacy from eligible studies, while the costs were taken from NHIF Drug and Service fee lists. Additionally, the budget impact analysis was performed, aiming to project annual savings by implementing PMAS as a part of anticoagulation clinics. PC has been perceived to be cost-effective strategy, since it enables a higher probability of well controlled INR value (additional effectiveness 0,154), along with lower costs (-374,51 RSD), compared to UMC. Negative incremental cost-effectiveness ratio additionally demonstrated cost-effectiveness of PC, as dominant strategy. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the model robustness, and budget impact analysis has also demonstrated significant annual savings, in the total amount of 50.863.313 RSD for a five year period 2016-2020. Providing PC to patients on warfarin represents a more cost-efficient strategy than UMS, in addition to better safety profile, which is why it should be implemented in the national health care system in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stojković et al. (2016) studied Patients on warfarin therapy. Pharmacist-Managed Anticoagulation Service vs. Usual Medical Care was evaluated on Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) based on probability of well-controlled INR (Dominant strategy). Pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service for patients on warfarin is a dominant strategy compared to usual medical care, increasing the probability of well-controlled INR by 0.154 while reducing costs by 374.51 RSD per patient.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: