This article explores how AMAN advances Indigenous rights against carbon trading policies, indicating significant barriers to advocacy.
This article explores how the Indigenous Peoples Alliance of the Archipelago (AMAN), Indonesia’s most influential Indigenous organization, mobilized advocacy strategies to challenge Indonesia’s forest carbon trade policy and advance Indigenous rights. Using the lens of policy entrepreneurship, it examines how AMAN employed strategies such as producing legal and spatial evidence, pursuing judicial review, engaging legislators, and leveraging electoral strategies to revoke the forest carbon trade policy and push for the long-delayed Indigenous Peoples Rights Bill as a safeguard. Based on semi-structured interviews and document analysis, the study finds that its efforts were constrained nationally by an oligarchic parliament, a different development mindset of the executive branch, and a closed judicial system in the Supreme Court. These barriers not only limited AMAN’s influence but also exposed structural challenges facing an Indigenous organization in climate policy. The findings underscore that supportive policy venues and networks are essential for transformative advocacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muhammad Arief Virgy (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: