Review integrates novel catecholamines' roles in organ regulation, highlighting therapeutic potential.
Catecholamines are classically viewed as neuronal transmitters and adrenal hormones; however, accumulating evidence demonstrates that sources other than nerve fibres and adrenal medulla play a fundamental role in local organ regulation. Physiological paradoxes, such as preserved organ function after denervation or transplantation, challenge a purely autonomic paradigm and point to intrinsic, tissue-based catecholaminergic control mechanisms. This review critically examines and integrates the emerging concept of endothelium- and epithelium-derived catecholamines, with a particular emphasis on the cardiovascular, genitourinary and respiratory systems. Experimental evidence supporting the biosynthesis, release, metabolism and functional roles of novel endogenous catecholamines, including 6-nitrodopamine (6-ND) and 6-cyanodopamine (6-CYD), is discussed. Endothelium-derived 6-ND and 6-CYD emerges as highly potent and long-lasting modulators of cardiovascular function, exerting positive chronotropic and inotropic effects, whilst uniquely potentiating the actions of classical catecholamines. In vascular tissues, including corpus cavernosum, 6-ND selectively antagonises dopamine-induced contractile responses and promotes smooth muscle relaxation through mechanisms largely independent of the canonical sGC-cGMP pathway. Notably, agarose-coupled 6-ND identified cyclase-associated proteins (CAPs) in cardiomyocyte membranes, linking 6-ND signalling to adenylyl cyclase regulation. In parallel, epithelium-derived catecholamines, including 6-ND and 6-CYD, have been identified throughout the genitourinary and respiratory systems, where they modulate smooth muscle tone. This review proposes a revised framework of autonomic regulation in which neural signalling is integrated with locally produced catecholamines acting in a paracrine and autocrine manner, underscoring their relevance as endogenous regulators and potential therapeutic targets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliveira et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: