Key result
High-dose intracoronary N-acetylcysteine did not reduce platelet activation biomarkers at 24 hours or major adverse clinical events at 2 years compared with placebo after primary PCI.
Why the study?
Does high-dose intracoronary N-acetylcysteine reduce platelet activation biomarkers in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
RCT (n=100)
Triple-blind
Randomized
Does high-dose intracoronary N-acetylcysteine reduce platelet activation biomarkers in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
High-dose intracoronary N-acetylcysteine does not reduce platelet activation biomarkers or improve clinical outcomes when administered during primary PCI for STEMI.
High-dose intracoronary N-acetylcysteine should not be used in STEMI primary PCI; confirms lack of benefit on biomarkers or 2-year outcomes.
During percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), trauma occurs in the arterial endothelium, resulting in platelet activation and aggregation. As platelet aggregation may lead to coronary thrombosis, antiplatelet agents are essential adjunctive therapies in patients undergoing PCI. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the intracoronary administration of high-dose N-acetylcysteine (NAC) for the evaluation of its antiplatelet effects in human subjects. In this triple-blind trial, 147 patients undergoing primary PCI were enrolled. Finally, 100 patients were randomized to receive high-dose intracoronary NAC (100 mg/kg bolus, followed by 10 mg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹ intracoronary continued intravenously for 12 hours) (n = 50) or dextrose solution (n = 50). Platelet activation biomarkers were measured before and 24 hours after the procedure. Secondary end points, comprising all-cause death, reinfarction, and target-vessel revascularization, were assessed at 30 days and 2 years. In comparison with the placebo, NAC could not reduce the level of platelet activation biomarkers within a 24-hour period after its prescription. Major adverse clinical events at 30 days and 2 years were infrequent and not statistically different between the 2 groups. Our results revealed that NAC, compared with the placebo, did not provide an additional clinical benefit as an effective antiplatelet agent after PCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eshraghi et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (n=100). Intracoronary N-acetylcysteine (NAC) vs. Dextrose solution (placebo) was evaluated on Platelet activation biomarkers at 24 hours. High-dose intracoronary N-acetylcysteine did not reduce platelet activation biomarkers at 24 hours or major adverse clinical events at 2 years compared with placebo after primary PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: