Key result
Off-pump CABG with valve surgery linked to ~37% lower POAF and reduced AKI versus on-pump.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate how reducing cardiopulmonary bypass duration using the off-pump CABG technique affects short-term prognosis in patients undergoing combined valve and coronary surgery.
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) reduce operative mortality, POAF, stroke, AKI, and PMI compared to on-pump CABG in adult patients undergoing combined CABG and valve surgery?
Cohort (n=884)
No
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) reduce operative mortality, POAF, stroke, AKI, and PMI compared to on-pump CABG in adult patients undergoing combined CABG and valve surgery?
Effect estimate: OR 0.63 (95% CI 0.44-0.91)
Absolute Event Rate: 29.5% vs 39.5%
p-value: p=0.014
In patients undergoing combined CABG and valve surgery, utilizing the off-pump CABG technique significantly reduces the short-term incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation and acute kidney injury compared to on-pump CABG.
OPCABG may be considered in combined procedures but should not yet change practice; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Background Combined valve and coronary surgery is a commonly performed surgical technique for treating coexisting valvular and coronary artery disease. This study aims to investigate the effect of reducing the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass by utilizing the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) technique on the short-term prognosis of patients. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 884 patients were divided into groups undergoing OPCABG or on-pump CABG combined with valve surgery based on the CABG technique. We evaluated the relationship between the surgical technique and operative mortality, postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), stroke, acute kidney failure (AKI), and perioperative myocardial infarction. Propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting (IPTW) were employed to mitigate differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Results The incidence of POAF and AKI were lower in the OPCABG group after IPTW (POAF: 29.5% vs. 39.5%, p = 0.016; AKI: 14.5% vs. 21.2%, p = 0.047). OPCABG technique was independently associated with the POAF (adjusted OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44–0.91, p = 0.014) and AKI (adjusted OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.39–0.98, p = 0.049). These results remained even following PSM and IPTW analyses. Conclusion The OPCABG technique is associated with reduced occurrences of POAF and AKI in patients undergoing valve and concomitant coronary surgery and can be safely used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Combined valvular and coronary heart disease (n=884). Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) vs. On-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (ONCABG) was evaluated on Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.44-0.91, p=0.014). Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting combined with valve surgery significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (OR 0.63) and acute kidney injury compared to on-pump surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: