Key result
Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead placement via mini-thoracotomy after a failed percutaneous attempt significantly improved mean left ventricular ejection fraction from 28.1% to 31.7%.
Why the study?
Does surgical placement of a left ventricular epicardial pacing lead via mini-thoracotomy improve echocardiographic and electrocardiographic parameters in heart failure patients after a failed percutaneous attempt?
Observational (n=30)
No
Does surgical placement of a left ventricular epicardial pacing lead via mini-thoracotomy improve echocardiographic and electrocardiographic parameters in heart failure patients after a failed percutaneous attempt?
Absolute Event Rate: 31.7% vs 28.1%
p-value: p=<0.001
Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead placement via mini-thoracotomy is a safe and effective alternative that improves LVEF and QRS duration in heart failure patients when percutaneous CRT attempts fail.
OBJECTIVE: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy has been shown to be an effective treatment to improve functional status and prolong survival of patients in advanced chronic heart failure. This study assessed the surgical outcomes of left anterior mini-thoracotomy for the implantation of left ventricular epicardial pacing leads in cardiac resynchronisation therapy. METHODS: Our study consisted of 30 consecutive patients who underwent cardiac resynchronisation therapy with a left thoracotomy between November 2010 and April 2012 in our clinic. Postoperative follow up included the assessment of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, electrocardiography and echocardiography. RESULTS: There were 22 male and eight female patients with a mean age of 68 ± 5.04 years. All patients were in NYHA class III or IV. Pre-procedure mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 28.1 ± 4.5% and post-procedural ejection fraction improved to 31.7 ± 5.1%. The pre-operative QRS duration changed from 171.7 ± 10.8 to 156.2 ± 4.4 ms after the operation. Also there was a significant reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic dimension from 6.98 ± 0.8 to 6.72 ± 0.8 mm (p < 0 .05), but no change in left ventricular end-systolic dimension and severity of mitral regurgitation. All patients had successful surgical left ventricular lead placement. There was no procedure-related mortality. The mean follow-up time was 40.4 months. CONCLUSION: Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead placement procedure is a safe and effective technique in patients with a failed percutaneous attempt.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ezelsoy et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Heart failure with failed percutaneous CRT attempt (n=30). Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead placement via mini-thoracotomy vs. Pre-procedural baseline was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p=<0.001). Surgical epicardial left ventricular lead placement via mini-thoracotomy after a failed percutaneous attempt significantly improved mean left ventricular ejection fraction from 28.1% to 31.7%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: