Key result
Women with previous pre-eclampsia and/or IUGR had higher peripheral vascular resistance (1499 vs 1250 dynes.s-1 cm-5; p=0.005) and brachial diastolic BP (78 vs 71 mmHg; p=0.03) than controls.
Why the study?
Do women with previous pregnancy complications (recurrent miscarriage, pre-eclampsia, IUGR) have abnormal prepregnancy cardiovascular function compared to women with previous normal pregnancies?
Observational (n=74)
Do women with previous pregnancy complications (recurrent miscarriage, pre-eclampsia, IUGR) have abnormal prepregnancy cardiovascular function compared to women with previous normal pregnancies?
Absolute Event Rate: 78% vs 71%
p-value: p=0.03
Women with previous pre-eclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction exhibit higher blood pressure and peripheral vascular resistance prior to subsequent pregnancies, indicating an increased baseline cardiovascular risk.
May warrant pre-pregnancy CV assessment after pre-eclampsia or IUGR; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate prepregnancy cardiovascular function and risk factors in women with previous pregnancy complications. METHODS: Thirty-four women with previous normal pregnancy (controls), 26 with unexplained recurrent miscarriage (RM) and 14 with pre-eclampsia (PE) and/or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), planning to conceive were recruited. Brachial and central blood pressures (BP), cardiac output (CO), peripheral vascular resistance (PVR), aortic stiffness, blood biochemistry and platelet aggregation were assessed. RESULTS: Women with previous PE/IUGR had higher brachial diastolic BP (78 ± 9 vs 71 ± 7 mmHg; p = 0.03), central systolic BP (107 ± 10 vs 99 ± 8 mmHg; p = 0.03), mean arterial pressure (92 ± 10 vs 84 ± 8 mmHg; p = 0.01) and PVR (1499 ± 300 vs 1250 ± 220 dynes.s(-1) cm(-5); p = 0.005), than the controls. No differences were observed in either cardiovascular function or blood biochemistry in women with unexplained RM compared with the controls. Women with previous PE/IUGR though not with RM had a stronger family history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than controls. CONCLUSIONS: Women with previous PE and/or IUGR had higher BP and PVR compared with controls, which may predispose them to CVD later in life. However, in the absence of underlying vascular pathology, women with unexplained RM did not have abnormal cardiovascular function. Prepregnancy period provides an opportunity to identify cardiovascular risks in relation to previous obstetric history.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahendru et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Previous pregnancy complications (recurrent miscarriage, pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction) (n=74). Previous pre-eclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction vs. Previous normal pregnancy was evaluated on Brachial diastolic BP (mmHg) (p=0.03). Women with previous pre-eclampsia and/or IUGR had higher peripheral vascular resistance (1499 vs 1250 dynes.s-1 cm-5; p=0.005) and brachial diastolic BP (78 vs 71 mmHg; p=0.03) than controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: