Key result
Smartphone ECG shows excellent agreement with standard ECG in healthy horses with a 1 bpm bias.
Why the study?
Smartphone ECG devices with inseparable electrodes create only precordial readings in animals and are not always reliable for measuring deflection durations, prompting evaluation of a novel portable device against standard base-apex electrocardiography.
Does a smartphone-based 1-lead ECG device provide reliable heart rate and cardiac deflection measurements compared to a reference ECG system in healthy horses?
Cross-Sectional (n=28)
Single-blind
No
Does a smartphone-based 1-lead ECG device provide reliable heart rate and cardiac deflection measurements compared to a reference ECG system in healthy horses?
A novel smartphone-based 1-lead ECG device provides reliable heart rate and cardiac deflection measurements in healthy horses, suggesting utility as a field diagnostic tool.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid equine field ECG screening; leaves open validation in diseased horses before clinical use.
Recently, the use of smartphone ECG devices has been reported in humans and animals. Nevertheless, as the electrodes of these devices are inseparable, they can create only a precordial reading in veterinary species. Thus, although the smartphone ECG devices are considered valuable as a screening tool for the detection of some common arrhythmias, they are not always a reliable method for the measurement of the duration of the electrical deflections. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of a novel smartphone ECG device, to report the readings obtained recorded simultaneously with a reference ECG system, and to compare the heart rate and duration of cardiac deflections obtained with the two methods. A total of 28 healthy mares of different breeds and age were included in this study and ECG recordings were obtained simultaneously with a reference ECG telemetry system with surface electrodes attached to the skin with alligator clips using a standard base-apex system and a smartphone ECG device with electrodes positioned alternatively with a standard and a modified base apex derivation. All the recordings obtained were considered acceptable for interpretation. An excellent agreement was found between the two methods for the evaluation of heart rate and polarity of cardiac deflections. No differences regarding number, duration and percentage of artifacts were found. This technology could become a valid diagnostic tool in the cardiological assessment of horses, in particular on the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vitale et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy horses (n=28). Smartphone ECG device (eKuore) vs. Standard base-apex electrocardiography (rECG) was evaluated on Heart rate (MBA configuration) (Bias 1 bpm, 95% CI -5 to 3). The smartphone ECG device (eKuore) demonstrated excellent agreement with standard electrocardiography for evaluating heart rate and cardiac deflection polarity in healthy horses.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: