Key result
Smartphone single-lead ECG achieves near-perfect agreement with standard ECG for foal heart rate classification.
Why the study?
Smartphone-based ECG technology has spread for screening in adult horses and other animals, but its feasibility and accuracy in healthy foals had not been assessed.
Does a smartphone-based single lead electrocardiograph accurately measure heart rate and ECG parameters compared to standard base-apex ECG in healthy foals?
Observational (n=22)
Single-blind
No
Does a smartphone-based single lead electrocardiograph accurately measure heart rate and ECG parameters compared to standard base-apex ECG in healthy foals?
A smartphone-based single-lead ECG provides good quality tracings and reliable heart rate measurements in healthy foals, though P wave and QRS complex polarities may differ from standard base-apex ECG.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support smartphone ECG for foal heart rate monitoring; leaves open validation in disease and clinical settings.
Smartphone-based technology for ECG recording has recently spread as a complementary tool for electrocardiographic screening and monitoring in adult horses and in other animal species. The present study aimed to assess the feasibility and accuracy of a smartphone-based ECG in healthy foals. This was a prospective observational study (authorization n. 45,865/2016) including 22 foals aged less than 21 days. A reference standard base-apex ECG (rECG) was acquired, and a smartphone ECG (sECG) was recorded immediately after by using a smartphone-based single lead electrocardiograph. All ECG tracings were evaluated in a blind fashion by a single board-certified cardiologist, who judged whether the tracings were acceptable for interpretation and performed ECG measurements and diagnosis. The Spearman correlation coefficient, the Cohen's k test and the Bland-Altman test were used to assess the agreement between sECG and rECG. All sECG tracings were acceptable for interpretation. All foals showed sinus rhythm on both rRCG and sECG tracings, with perfect agreement in heart rate classification (κ = 0.87; p < 0.001). No clinically relevant differences were found in the assessment of waves and intervals duration. Concerning P wave and QRS complex polarity, the percentage of agreement between rECG and sECG was 78% and 83%, respectively. About ECG tracing quality, rECG and sECG showed a substantial agreement (κ = 0.624; p < 0.001). In conclusion, the smartphone-based ECG device tested in the present study recorded good quality single-lead ECG tracings in foals, reliable for heart rate and ECG measurements, but different polarity of P waves and QRS complexes was found in some foals in comparison to rECG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bindi et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Healthy foals (n=22). Smartphone-based single lead electrocardiograph (sECG) vs. Standard base-apex electrocardiography (rECG) was evaluated on Agreement in heart rate classification between sECG and rECG (κ = 0.87, 95% CI 0.623-1.116, p=<0.001). A smartphone-based single-lead ECG device demonstrated almost perfect agreement with standard base-apex ECG for heart rate classification in healthy foals.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: