Key result
Smartphone-based ECG yields 100% readable tracings and matches conventional ECG for rhythm classification in foals.
Why the study?
Smartphone-based ECG is increasingly explored for cardiac assessment in veterinary species, but its usability and reliability in healthy foals needed investigation.
Does a smartphone-based ECG system provide reliable and usable cardiac assessment compared to conventional ECG in healthy foals?
Observational (n=39)
Single-blind
Does a smartphone-based ECG system provide reliable and usable cardiac assessment compared to conventional ECG in healthy foals?
A smartphone-based ECG system demonstrated good usability and reliability for rapid cardiac assessment in foals without the need for clipping or sedation.
Supports feasibility of unsedated smartphone ECG in healthy foals; leaves open validation in diseased animals before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Smartphone-based electrocardiography (ECG) is increasingly explored as a practical tool for cardiac assessment in veterinary species. AIMS: The aim of this prospective observational study was to investigate the usability and reliability of a new smartphone-based ECG system (Eko DUO) in healthy foals. METHODS: A total of 39 foals, aged 1 to 59 days, were enrolled. ECGs were recorded using the smartphone device in all animals, while a subgroup of 10 foals also underwent simultaneous recording with a conventional base-apex ECG (rECG) to enable direct comparison. All tracings were reviewed blindly by a single evaluator to assess interpretability, rhythm, and ECG parameters. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The smartphone ECG (sECG) provided readable tracings in all foals without requiring clipping or sedation. Sinus rhythm was identified in every subject, and heart rate classification (normal, bradycardia, or tachycardia) showed complete concordance with the rECG, supporting its clinical applicability for rapid cardiac assessment. No significant discrepancies were detected for heart rate, PR interval, or QT interval measurements, although P wave duration was shorter and QRS complex slightly longer in sECG recordings. The polarity of QRS complexes matched across systems, while P wave polarity varied. A moderate agreement concerning ECG quality and artifact was found. CONCLUSION: The smartphone ECG system showed good performance in field conditions, enabling rapid acquisition of clinically interpretable tracings and accurate heart rate evaluation, though variations in wave morphology should be acknowledged during clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tognetti et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Healthy foals (n=39). Smartphone-based ECG system (Eko DUO) vs. Conventional base-apex ECG (rECG) was evaluated on Interpretability, rhythm, and ECG parameters. A smartphone-based ECG system provided readable tracings in all 39 foals without clipping or sedation and showed complete concordance with conventional ECG for heart rate classification.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: