Key result
Intramyocardial AdVEGF-D gene therapy did not significantly increase arrhythmias over 8.2 years of follow-up and improved heart rate variability in patients with refractory angina.
Why the study?
Evidence suggested intramyocardial delivery and VEGF overexpression might induce ventricular arrhythmias, prompting investigation of whether intramyocardial AdVEGF-D gene therapy increases arrhythmia risk in refractory angina.
Does intramyocardial AdVEGF-D gene therapy increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with refractory angina?
RCT (n=30)
4:1
Does intramyocardial AdVEGF-D gene therapy increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with refractory angina?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Intramyocardial AdVEGF-D gene therapy does not increase the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with refractory angina and may improve heart rate variability.
BACKGROUND: (AdVEGF-D) gene therapy (GT) to alleviate symptoms in refractory angina (RA) patients. In KAT301, 30 patients with RA were randomized to AdVEGF-D or the control group in 4:1 ratio. The treatment was found to be feasible, increasing myocardial perfusion and reducing angina symptoms at 1-year follow-up. However, there is some evidence suggesting that the intramyocardial delivery route and overexpression of (vascular endothelial growth) VEGFs might induce ventricular arrhythmias. Thus, we investigated whether intramyocardial AdVEGF-D GT increases the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients treated for RA. METHODS: We analyzed non-invasive risk predictors of ventricular arrhythmias from 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) as well as heart rate variability (HRV) and the incidence of arrhythmias from 24 h ambulatory ECG at baseline and 3 and 12 months after the GT. In addition, we analyzed the incidence of new-onset arrhythmias and pacemaker implantations during 8.2 years (range 6.3-10.4 years) of follow-up. RESULTS: We found no significant increase in arrhythmias, including supraventricular and ventricular ectopic beats, atrial fibrillation, non-sustained ventricular tachycardias, and life-threatening tachycardias, nor changes in the non-invasive risk predictors of ventricular arrhythmias in the AdVEGF-D treated patients. Instead, we found a significant improvement in the very low and high-frequency bands of HRV suggestive of improved cardiac autonomic regulation after GT. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our results suggest that AdVEGF-D GT does not predispose to arrhythmias and might improve HRV metrics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leikas et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Refractory angina (n=30). Intramyocardial AdVEGF-D gene therapy vs. Control group was evaluated on Incidence of arrhythmias and non-invasive risk predictors. Intramyocardial AdVEGF-D gene therapy did not significantly increase arrhythmias over 8.2 years of follow-up and improved heart rate variability in patients with refractory angina.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: