Key result
Intramyocardial AdVEGF-B and AdVEGF-D gene transfer increases stress myocardial perfusion ~40% in a porcine model.
Why the study?
Does intramyocardial adenoviral gene transfer of VEGF-B 186 or VEGF-D ΔNΔC increase myocardial perfusion and angiogenesis in a porcine model?
Does intramyocardial adenoviral gene transfer of VEGF-B 186 or VEGF-D ΔNΔC increase myocardial perfusion and angiogenesis in a porcine model?
Effect estimate: 1.4-fold increase (95% CI 1.1-1.7)
Intramyocardial gene transfer of VEGF-B 186 and VEGF-D ΔNΔC safely induces angiogenesis and increases myocardial perfusion under stress in a porcine model, suggesting potential for treating refractory angina.
Animal data support VEGF gene transfer for myocardial angiogenesis; leaves open translation to human refractory angina trials.
Objective Coronary heart disease remains a significant clinical problem, and new therapies are needed especially for patients with refractory angina for whom the current therapies do not provide sufficient relief. The aim of this study was to find out if angiogenic gene therapy using new members of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family, VEGF-B 186 and VEGF-D ΔNΔC , increase myocardial perfusion as measured by the positron emission tomography (PET) 15 O-imaging, and whether there would be coronary steal effect to the contralateral side. Furthermore, safety of intramyocardial angiogenic adenoviral gene transfer was evaluated. Methods Intramyocardial adenoviral (Ad) VEGF-B 186 or AdVEGF-D ΔNΔC gene transfers were given endovascularly into the porcine posterolateral wall of the left ventricle (n=34). Six days later, PET 15 O-imaging for myocardial perfusion and coronary angiography were performed. Results AdVEGF-B 186 and AdVEGF-D ΔNΔC induced angiogenesis and increased total microvascular area 1.8-fold (95% CI 0.2 to 3.5) and 2.8-fold (95% CI 1.4 to 4.3), respectively. At rest, perfusion was maintained at normal levels, but at stress, relative perfusion was increased 1.4-fold (95% CI 1.1 to 1.7) for AdVEGF-B 186 and 1.3-fold (95% CI 1.0 to 1.7) for AdVEGF-D ΔNΔC , without causing coronary steal effect in the control area. The therapy was well tolerated and did not lead to any significant changes in laboratory safety parameters. Conclusions Both AdVEGF-B 186 and AdVEGF-D ΔNΔC gene transfers induced efficient angiogenesis in the myocardium resulting in an increased myocardial perfusion measured by PET. Importantly, local perfusion increase did not induce any coronary steal effect. As such, both treatments seem suitable new candidates for the induction of therapeutic angiogenesis for the treatment of refractory angina.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nurro et al. (2016) studied Coronary heart disease (n=34). AdVEGF-B 186 and AdVEGF-D ΔNΔC vs. Control area was evaluated on Relative perfusion at stress (1.4-fold increase, 95% CI 1.1-1.7). Intramyocardial gene transfer of AdVEGF-B 186 and AdVEGF-D ΔNΔC increased stress myocardial perfusion by 1.4-fold (95% CI 1.1-1.7) and 1.3-fold (95% CI 1.0-1.7) respectively in a porcine model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: