Why the study?
Does the combination of VEGF165 and Ang1 improve angiogenesis, cardiomyocyte proliferation, and cardiac function in rats with induced myocardial ischemia?
Does the combination of VEGF165 and Ang1 improve angiogenesis, cardiomyocyte proliferation, and cardiac function in rats with induced myocardial ischemia?
The combination of VEGF165 and Ang1 gene therapy improves angiogenesis, cardiomyocyte proliferation, and cardiac function in a rat model of myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports combined VEGF165/Ang1 therapy in rat ischemia models; leaves open translation to human myocardial infarction.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether the combination of 2 angiogenic growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor 165(VEGF165) and angiopoietin-1 (Ang1), could increase angiogenesis and cardiomyocyte(CM) proliferation in an infarcted myocardium. METHODS: Myocardial ischemia was induced in rats by ligation of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. Replication-deficient adenoviruses encoding VEGF165 (Ad-VEGF165), Ang1 (Ad-Ang1) or enhanced green fluorescence protein (Ad-EGFP) was injected into the ischemic myocardium immediately. Bromodexyuridine (BrdU) was administered intraperitoneally 1 week after ligation. One week later, the hearts were harvested and sectioned for hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and immunohistochemistry to evaluate densities of capillary, arteriole and double labelled BrdU(+) CM. M-mode echocardiography was used to evaluate the cardiac function. RESULTS: Ang1 significantly increased collateral vessel formation. Both VEGF165 and Ang1 significantly increased densities of capillary and arteriole, as well as the number of double labelled BrdU(+) CM, and improved cardiac function. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the combination of VEGF165 and Ang1 can increase both myocardial angiogenesis and CM proliferation following myocardial ischemia in rats, leading to improved cardiac function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: