Key result
None of the 52 pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy met the published Class I adult criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy, with 0 patients having an LBBB pattern on ECG.
Why the study?
Do pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy meet traditional adult criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Cohort (n=52)
No
Do pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy meet traditional adult criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy do not meet traditional adult ECG criteria for CRT, demonstrating that extrapolation of adult heart failure guidelines to pediatrics is insufficient.
Challenges extrapolation of adult CRT criteria to pediatric DCM; leaves open need for dedicated pediatric trials.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective device-based intervention for adults with heart failure (HF) with specific indications, based on large, multicenter randomized clinical trials. The criteria for CRT in adult HF include significant symptoms, ventricular systolic dysfunction, prolonged QRS duration, and left bundle branch block (LBBB) pattern on electrocardiogram (ECG). Despite having less data, CRT is also being widely utilized in children with HF. The shortage of evidence-based CRT criteria in pediatrics prompted us to review a cohort of children with dilated cardiomyopathy and evaluate their potential eligibility for CRT using the traditional adult criteria. METHODS: Single-center data of all pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy were extracted from the heart failure registry and retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had at least 2 separate visits that included HF scoring, electrocardiogram, and echocardiogram were included. Patients who were ventricular paced were excluded. RESULTS: Data for 52 patients meeting inclusion criteria were analyzed. The mean ejection fraction was 25% on the first clinical evaluation and 27% on the second visit. No patient and 2 patients met the adult criteria for prolonged QRS on the first and second encounters, respectively. No patients had an LBBB pattern on ECG. CONCLUSIONS: None of the pediatric HF patients in our study met the published Class I criteria for CRT device therapy in adults. These findings suggest that extrapolation of adult HF data to pediatrics is not sufficient for CRT criteria. Specific guidelines for device implantation in children must be based on scientific investigation including pediatric clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schiller et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy (n=52). Traditional adult criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was evaluated on Meeting adult criteria for prolonged QRS and LBBB pattern on ECG. None of the 52 pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy met the published Class I adult criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy, with 0 patients having an LBBB pattern on ECG.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: