Key result
Multicenter CMR studies in pediatric CHD require structured approaches to overcome regulatory and logistical barriers.
Why the study?
Large CMR studies and registries are lacking for pediatric and congenital heart disease, with most existing pediatric CMR research limited to small studies.
This review provides a practical framework and highlights challenges for developing large-scale, multicenter cardiovascular magnetic resonance studies in pediatric and congenital heart disease.
Structured approaches may enable multicenter pediatric CMR studies; leaves open scalable implementation and prospective validation.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has become the reference standard for quantitative and qualitative assessment of ventricular function, blood flow, and myocardial tissue characterization. There is a preponderance of large CMR studies and registries in adults; However, similarly powered studies are lacking for the pediatric and congenital heart disease (PCHD) population. To date, most CMR studies in children are limited to small single or multicenter studies, thereby limiting the conclusions that can be drawn. Within the PCHD CMR community, a collaborative effort has been successfully employed to recognize knowledge gaps with the aim to embolden the development and initiation of high-quality, large-scale multicenter research. In this publication, we highlight the underlying challenges and provide a practical guide toward the development of larger, multicenter initiatives focusing on PCHD populations, which can serve as a model for future multicenter efforts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DiLorenzo et al. (2024) conducted a review in Pediatric and congenital heart disease. Multicenter cardiovascular magnetic resonance research was evaluated. Multicenter cardiovascular magnetic resonance studies in pediatric and congenital heart disease require structured approaches to overcome regulatory, logistical, and funding barriers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: