Key result
Despite presenting with significantly more cardiovascular risk factors, American Indian patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting had similar risk-adjusted operative mortality (OR 1.26) compared to non-American Indian patients.
Why the study?
Does American Indian racial identity affect short-term outcomes and 5-year survival in patients undergoing isolated CABG?
Cohort (n=1,310)
No
Does American Indian racial identity affect short-term outcomes and 5-year survival in patients undergoing isolated CABG?
Effect estimate: OR 1.26 (95% CI 0.19-4.98)
Absolute Event Rate: 2.7% vs 1.6%
p-value: p=0.771
Despite presenting with significantly higher rates of cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes and tobacco use, Northern Plains American Indians have similar short-term and 5-year survival outcomes after CABG compared to non-American Indians.
Similar adjusted CABG mortality in American Indians despite higher risks supports equitable short-term outcomes; leaves open access and longer-term disparities.
Objectives: Heart disease is the leading cause of death in American Indians (AIs). For AI patients with severe coronary artery disease requiring coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, little data exist. The purpose of this study was to evaluate short-term outcomes of Northern Plains AI undergoing CABG and identify variations in patient presentation. Methods: All patients undergoing isolated CABG between June 2012 and June 2017 were studied. Seventy-four AI and 1236 non-American Indian (non-AI) patients were identified. Risk factors, preoperative characteristics, cardiac status, procedural information, and outcomes were collected. Univariate analysis comparing short-term clinical outcomes between AI and non-AI populations was performed. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed and outcome differences assessed. Unadjusted Kaplan–Meier survival estimates were produced using 5-year survival data. Results: AI patients presented with increased risk factors, including higher rates of diabetes mellitus (AI 63.5% vs. non-AI 38.7% p=< 0.001) and smoking/tobacco use (AI 60.8% vs. non-AI 20.0% p=> 0.001). Seventy-nine percent of AI patients resided on or near federal reservations and presented from rural locations. Internal mammary artery (IMA) graft use in both groups was high (AI 95.9% vs. non-AI 94.9% p=0.904), and multiarterial grafting with left internal mammary artery and radial artery use was common in both groups (AI 67.6% vs. non-AI 69.6% p=0.814). No significant differences in unadjusted 30-day mortality or short-term outcomes were detected. Adjusted Kaplan–Meier survival curves were similar between race groups up through 5 years after CABG (p-value=0.38). Conclusion: AIs presented with significantly more risk factors for cardiovascular disease compared with the general population, with especially high rates of insulin-dependent diabetes and active tobacco use. Despite this, outcomes were similar between groups. In propensity-matched groups, AIs were at decreased risk for prolonged length of stay and combined morbidity/mortality. In contrast to previous reports, AI racial identity did not adversely affect survival up to 5 years after CABG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anderson et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Severe coronary artery disease requiring coronary artery bypass grafting (n=1,310). American Indian race vs. Non-American Indian race was evaluated on Operative mortality (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.19-4.98, p=0.771). Despite presenting with significantly more cardiovascular risk factors, American Indian patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting had similar risk-adjusted operative mortality (OR 1.26) compared to non-American Indian patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: