Key result
Amlodipine did not significantly slow the 36-month angiographic progression of coronary atherosclerosis compared to placebo (0.095 mm vs 0.084 mm reduction in minimal diameter; P=0.38).
Why the study?
Does amlodipine slow the progression of early coronary atherosclerosis in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease?
Population
825 patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease
Comparison
Amlodipine vs Placebo
Design
RCT, randomized, double-masked
Follow-up
36-month
Authors
Loading...
Amlodipine does not slow angiographic coronary atherosclerosis progression; challenges prior calcium channel blocker data and does not support use for this indication.
RCT (n=825)
double-masked
randomized
Yes
Does amlodipine slow the progression of early coronary atherosclerosis in patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.095% vs 0.084%
p-value: p=0.38
Amlodipine did not slow the angiographic progression of coronary atherosclerosis but significantly slowed carotid atherosclerosis progression and reduced hospitalizations for unstable angina and revascularization.
Pitt et al. (2000) conducted an RCT in coronary artery disease (n=825). amlodipine vs. placebo was evaluated on average 36-month angiographic change in mean minimal diameters of segments with a baseline diameter stenosis of 30% (p=0.38). Amlodipine did not significantly slow the 36-month angiographic progression of coronary atherosclerosis compared to placebo (0.095 mm vs 0.084 mm reduction in minimal diameter; P=0.38).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: