Key result
Computer models of cardiac electromechanics provide a better understanding of disease mechanisms and hold promise for improving patient-specific diagnosis and planning of cardiac resynchronisation therapy.
This review highlights the potential of computer modelling to improve the understanding and application of cardiac resynchronisation therapy through patient-specific models.
May inform future CRT planning; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Mathematical or computer models have become increasingly popular in biomedical science. Although they are a simplification of reality, computer models are able to link a multitude of processes to each other. In the fields of cardiac physiology and cardiology, models can be used to describe the combined activity of all ion channels (electrical models) or contraction-related processes (mechanical models) in potentially millions of cardiac cells. Electromechanical models go one step further by coupling electrical and mechanical processes and incorporating mechano-electrical feedback. The field of cardiac computer modelling is making rapid progress due to advances in research and the ever-increasing calculation power of computers. Computer models have helped to provide better understanding of disease mechanisms and treatment. The ultimate goal will be to create patient-specific models using diagnostic measurements from the individual patient. This paper gives a brief overview of computer models in the field of cardiology and mentions some scientific achievements and clinical applications, especially in relation to cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pluijmert et al. (2015) conducted a review in Heart failure. Computer modelling was evaluated. Computer models of cardiac electromechanics provide a better understanding of disease mechanisms and hold promise for improving patient-specific diagnosis and planning of cardiac resynchronisation therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: