Key result
Beta-blocker therapy is considered safe and potentially life-saving for children with severe heart failure based on long-term clinical experience.
Why the study?
Do beta-blockers improve survival and outcomes in children with severe heart failure?
Do beta-blockers improve survival and outcomes in children with severe heart failure?
This editorial highlights the historical shift and clinical experience supporting the safety and life-saving potential of beta-blockers in pediatric heart failure.
Heart failure remains the main cause of death in children with heart disease. In USA and Europe hospital mortality of children with heart failure is about 7% of children, nearly twice as high as in adults. In this review a group of authors report about their experience with beta-blockers in childhood heart failure. Most of them start to treat children with severe heart failure at a time - 20 years ago - when beta blockers seem to be contraindicated in this situation. The physicians and their patients and/or parents all are aware of the risk of this decision. However, unproven medical therapies for heart failure are the most important therapeutical dilemma in pediatric cardiology. The authors carefully observed a highly selected group of patients with the highest risk to die and had the patience to wait for the longtime follow up. Today - based upon this experience -we know that beta blockers are safe and may save the lives of many children with heart disease all over the world. Together with young colleagues who enthusiastically support this idea the authors now intend to break down the "wall of ignorance" for this promising therapy in pediatric cardiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buchhorn et al. (2014) conducted an editorial in Heart failure in children with heart disease. Beta-blockers was evaluated. Beta-blocker therapy is considered safe and potentially life-saving for children with severe heart failure based on long-term clinical experience.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: