Key result
First-segment transaxillary access shows similar major bleeding and vascular complications for Impella-supported PCI and TAVR.
Why the study?
Percutaneous transaxillary approach through the first segment of the axillary artery is not widely recognized as safe, and it had never been directly compared between Impella-supported PCI and TAVR.
Does percutaneous transaxillary approach through the first segment of the axillary artery have different safety profiles (bleeding and vascular complications) when used for Impella-supported PCI compared to TAVR in patients without femoral access?
Observational (n=46)
No
Does percutaneous transaxillary approach through the first segment of the axillary artery have different safety profiles (bleeding and vascular complications) when used for Impella-supported PCI compared to TAVR in patients without femoral access?
Percutaneous transaxillary approach through the first segment of the axillary artery is feasible for both Impella-supported PCI and TAVR, though it is associated with frequent hemoglobin drops meeting BARC 3 bleeding criteria, particularly in Impella patients due to longer implant durations.
High bleeding rates with transaxillary access merit caution in non-femoral cases; leaves open whether refinements improve safety in prospective studies.
Percutaneous transaxillary approach (PTAX) through the first segment of the axillary artery is not widely recognized as a safe method. Furthermore, PTAX has never been directly compared between Impella-supported percutaneous coronary interventions (Impella-PCI) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of PTAX through the first axillary segment in Impella-PCI versus TAVR. In cases where standard imaging guidance was insufficient, a technique involving puncturing the axillary artery "on-the-balloon" was employed. The endpoints were bleeding and vascular complications, as defined by BARC and VARC-3 criteria. PTAX was successfully performed in all 46 attempted cases: 23 for Impella-PCI and 23 for TAVR. Strict adherence to BARC and VARC-3 criteria led to the frequent identification of major bleeding (57%) and a moderately frequent diagnosis of vascular complications (17%). These incidences were primarily based on post-procedural hemoglobin reduction (> 3 g/dl) but not overt bleeding. The Impella group exhibited a higher rate of BARC 3b bleeding due to a greater hemoglobin decline resulting from the prolonged implant duration and PCI itself. Left axillary access was linked to smaller blood loss. Bleeding and vascular complications, as per BARC and VARC-3 definitions, did not affect short-term prognosis, with only 3 Impella patients succumbing to heart failure unrelated to the procedures during one-month follow-up period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sacha et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Patients without femoral access requiring high-risk PCI with Impella support or TAVR (n=46). Percutaneous transaxillary approach (PTAX) for Impella-supported PCI vs. PTAX for TAVR was evaluated on BARC type 3 bleeding and major vascular complications (VARC-3). Percutaneous transaxillary approach through the first segment of the axillary artery resulted in similar rates of BARC 3 bleeding (57% overall) and major vascular complications (17% overall) between Impella-supported PCI and TAVR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: