Why the study?
Axillary artery access is increasingly used as an alternative to femoral access for large-bore TAVR, EVAR, and MCS, but guidance on best practices, complication management, and training is needed.
This SCAI position statement establishes best practices and training recommendations for percutaneous axillary arterial access, an increasingly used alternative to the femoral route for large-bore procedures.
Supports percutaneous axillary access for large-bore TAVR/EVAR/MCS; extends consensus best-practice guidance for this alternative route.
Axillary artery access has become increasingly widespread as an alternative to the femoral route for large-bore transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) procedures. Advantages of percutaneous access include avoidance of a surgical incision, general anesthesia, and conduit graft infection. This statement aims to review the anatomic considerations and risks for percutaneous axillary artery access, suggest best practices for access techniques, hemostasis/closure strategies, and complication management, and recommend options for training and privileging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seto et al. (2022) conducted a review in Large-bore transcatheter procedures (TAVR, EVAR, MCS). Percutaneous axillary arterial access was evaluated. This SCAI position statement outlines best practices, anatomic considerations, risks, and training recommendations for percutaneous axillary artery access in large-bore procedures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: