Key result
Percutaneous transaxillary access serves as an established alternative to transfemoral access for large-bore interventions.
Why the study?
Percutaneous transaxillary access is an alternative to transfemoral large-bore access, but poses distinct technical and anatomical challenges requiring specific guidance.
Percutaneous transaxillary access is a viable alternative for large-bore cardiovascular interventions, requiring specific technical expertise for safe puncture, closure, and complication management.
Transaxillary access requires meticulous planning to avoid complications; leaves optimal techniques and outcomes open for prospective study.
Percutaneous transaxillary access is an established alternative to transfemoral large-bore arterial access for transcatheter structural heart interventions and mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Although useful for overcoming hostile iliofemoral anatomy and providing prolonged support and patient mobilization in case of MCS, the axillary/subclavian territory poses distinct technical and anatomical challenges that demand meticulous pre-procedural imaging, patient selection, accurate puncture under ultrasound and angiographic guidance, preservation of bailout access, and familiarity with suture-based and balloon-assisted closure strategies. This review provides a contemporary practical framework for percutaneous transaxillary access, summarizing the available clinical evidence, technical aspects of puncture and closure, complication management, and procedural tips to improve safety and reproducibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Secco et al. (2026) conducted a review in Transcatheter structural heart interventions and mechanical circulatory support. Percutaneous transaxillary access vs. Transfemoral large-bore arterial access was evaluated. Percutaneous transaxillary access serves as an established alternative to transfemoral access for large-bore interventions, requiring meticulous imaging, patient selection, and closure strategies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: