Key result
Preoperative CT-scan measurements of coronary ostia distance showed mild, non-significant correlation with intraoperative measurements (r=0.374, P=0.188 for left ostium).
Why the study?
Does preoperative CT-scan accurately predict the distance from coronary ostia to the calcified aortic valve compared to intraoperative measurements in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Observational (n=60)
Does preoperative CT-scan accurately predict the distance from coronary ostia to the calcified aortic valve compared to intraoperative measurements in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
Effect estimate: r = 0.374
p-value: p=0.188
Preoperative CT-scan evaluation may be a useful tool to identify patients with short distances from coronary ostia to the aortic valve, which is relevant for preventing coronary occlusion during TAVI.
OBJECTIVES: Shorter distances from coronary ostia to the calcified aortic valve may result in occlusion with potential infarction during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. We hypothesized that preoperative CT-scan measurements might predict coronary occlusion. METHODS: Distances from the coronary ostia to the calcified aortic valve were measured during open heart aortic valve replacement in 60 consecutive patients. Distances were compared to preoperative CT-scan measurements evaluating distance of the coronary ostia as well (n = 15). RESULTS: The distances of the lower lip of the left and the right coronary artery ostia measured from the aortic annulus were 14.7 ± 3.9 mm and 13.4 ± 4.0 mm, respectively. The left, right and noncoronary cusp heights were 13.9 ± 2.5 mm, 12.8 ± 3.0 mm and 13.3 ± 3.1 mm, respectively. Coronary ostia topography indicated variations from the middle to the noncoronary commissure in 40% for the left and 63% for the right coronary ostium. CT-scan based measurements resulted in a distance of 12.8 ± 3.5 mm for the left and 13.9 ± 4.0 mm for the right coronary ostium, compared to 14.2 ± 4.2 mm and 13.5 ± 4.3 mm measured intraoperatively. A mild correlation between both measurements could be observed (r = 0.374, P = 0.188, left and r = 0.46, P = 0.09, n = 15). CONCLUSIONS: CT-scan-based measurements differed from the intraoperative measurements, however preoperative CT-scan evaluation may be a useful tool to identify patients with short distance of coronaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wendt et al. (2012) conducted an observational in Calcified aortic valve (n=60). Preoperative CT-scan measurements vs. Intraoperative measurements was evaluated on Distance from the coronary ostia to the calcified aortic valve (r = 0.374, p=0.188). Preoperative CT-scan measurements of coronary ostia distance showed mild, non-significant correlation with intraoperative measurements (r=0.374, P=0.188 for left ostium).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: