PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 1995Hypertension593 citations

A Noninvasive Computerized Tail-Cuff System for Measuring Blood Pressure in Mice

View Full Paper
JKJohn H. KregeJHJeffrey B. HodginJHJohn R. Hagaman

Key Points

  • To evaluate and validate a fully automated, computerized tail-cuff system for measuring blood pressure across different hemodynamic states in mice.
  • Trained mice for at least 7 days before performing automated tail-cuff blood pressure and pulse rate measurements across at least 3 test days.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Mice (n=22 for individual comparison), including groups given enalapril, NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, or nothing in drinking water
I
Intervention
Noninvasive computerized tail-cuff system for measuring blood pressure
C
Comparator
Intra-arterial blood pressure measurement under unrestrained, unanesthetized conditions
O
Outcome
Correlation between tail-cuff and intra-arterial blood pressuressurrogate

A noninvasive computerized tail-cuff system provides reproducible blood pressure measurements in mice that highly correlate with intra-arterial measurements.

Abstract

We have validated a noninvasive computerized tail-cuff system for measuring blood pressure in mice. The system was designed to perform all functions automatically, including a programmable routine of cuff inflation and deflation, analysis and assignment of pulse rate and blood pressure, and recording of data electronically. To evaluate this system over a range of blood pressures, we gave groups of mice enalapril or NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester in their drinking water. For each of these groups, an equal number of control mice were given nothing in their drinking water. Tail-cuff blood pressures were recorded as the means of blood pressures determined on at least 3 days after at least 7 days of training. Tail-cuff enalapril and control group means were measured both 3 and 4 months after enalapril (or no drug) was begun; the group means at 3 months were not significantly different from the group means at 4 months. These results demonstrate that the system gives reproducible results. After the tail-cuff measurements were completed, intra-arterial blood pressures were attempted in all mice under unrestrained, unanesthetized conditions, and individual mouse (n = 22) blood pressures with the use of the two methods were compared. The blood pressures from individual mice by tail-cuff and intra-arterial methods were highly correlated (r = .86, P < .01). The means for the four mouse groups were also highly correlated (r = .98, P < .02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Krege et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a145e3d7753e742da59df38https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.25.5.1111
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper