Key result
BARC Type 3 or 5 bleeding was associated with increased 2-year mortality (adjusted HR 7.72; 95% CI 4.75-12.54), providing a similar mortality risk assessment to TIMI or GUSTO scales.
Why the study?
Does the BARC bleeding classification predict mortality similarly to TIMI and GUSTO scales in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Population
Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the all-comer PRODIGY trial
Comparison
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding… vs Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction and Global…
Design
Cohort, Prospectively adjudicated by a blinded Clinical Event Committee
Follow-up
2 years
Authors
Loading...
BARC may aid post-PCI mortality stratification similarly to TIMI/GUSTO; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
Observational
Blinded Clinical Event Committee
Does the BARC bleeding classification predict mortality similarly to TIMI and GUSTO scales in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Effect estimate: HR 7.72 (95% CI 4.75-12.54)
The BARC bleeding classification provides similar prognostic value for 2-year mortality as the established TIMI and GUSTO scales in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Vranckx et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Percutaneous coronary intervention. BARC bleeding classification vs. TIMI and GUSTO bleeding scales was evaluated on 2-year mortality (HR 7.72, 95% CI 4.75-12.54). BARC Type 3 or 5 bleeding was associated with increased 2-year mortality (adjusted HR 7.72; 95% CI 4.75-12.54), providing a similar mortality risk assessment to TIMI or GUSTO scales.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: