Key result
Incorrect cuff positioning by 90° laterally introduced a systematic overestimation of auscultatory systolic blood pressure by 4.9 mm Hg when using an undersized cuff, but not when correctly sized.
Why the study?
Does incorrect cuff positioning affect blood pressure measurement accuracy when using appropriately sized, undersized, or specially designed wide-range cuffs?
Observational (n=90)
Single-blind
Yes
Does incorrect cuff positioning affect blood pressure measurement accuracy when using appropriately sized, undersized, or specially designed wide-range cuffs?
Effect estimate: Mean difference 4.9 mm Hg
Absolute Event Rate: 129.5% vs 124.6%
p-value: p=<0.01
Incorrect cuff positioning causes systematic blood pressure overestimation only when the cuff is too small, an error that can be avoided by using appropriately sized or specially designed wide-range cuffs.
May bias auscultatory SBP with undersized cuffs; hypothesis-generating for wide-range cuff benefits, needs prospective validation.
During blood pressure (BP) measurement, the recommended positioning of the cuff bladder center is directly above the brachial artery. We investigated the relevance of incorrect cuff positioning during (1) auscultatory measurement with an appropriate or improperly small cuff and (2) oscillometric measurement with a wide-range cuff designed to guarantee accurate measurements regardless of position. In subjects with wide BP and arm circumference ranges, (1) auscultatory BP was repeatedly measured with a properly positioned cuff (reference) and, simultaneously, with an identical cuff placed on the other arm in either a correct or an incorrect position (test). The measurements were performed with a properly sized (N=57) or an improperly small cuff (N=33). (2) Auscultatory measurements obtained with a properly positioned and sized cuff were compared with oscillometric measurements obtained with a specially designed wide-range cuff (Omron IntelliWrap) placed on the contralateral arm either in a correct or an incorrect position. Auscultatory BP measures were unaffected by incorrect positioning of a properly sized cuff, whereas with undercuffing, BP was overestimated with the cuff displaced by 90° laterally (systolic/diastolic BP differences: 4.9±4.6/4.0±4.6 mm Hg, P<0.01) or by 180° (3.9±5.4/4.2±5.1 mm Hg, P<0.01) in relation to the correct position. Incorrect placement of the oscillometric cuff had no significant effect on the accuracy of the measurements (difference with correct position <1.5 mm Hg). Incorrect cuff positioning introduces a systematic overestimation of auscultatory BP when the cuff is too small in relation to arm circumference but not when it is correctly sized. No systematic error was observed with oscillometric measurements obtained with a specially designed wide-range cuff.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bilo et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Blood pressure measurement accuracy (n=90). Incorrect cuff positioning (90° laterally) vs. Correct cuff positioning was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure with undersized cuff (Mean difference 4.9 mm Hg, p=<0.01). Incorrect cuff positioning by 90° laterally introduced a systematic overestimation of auscultatory systolic blood pressure by 4.9 mm Hg when using an undersized cuff, but not when correctly sized.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: