PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 15, 2005Anesthesia & Analgesia93 citations

The Effect of Venous Pulsation on the Forehead Pulse Oximeter Wave Form as a Possible Source of Error in Spo2 Calculation

View Full Paper
KSKirk H. ShelleyDTDoris TamaiDJDenis H. Jablonka

Key Result

Forehead pulse oximeter sensors produced complex wave forms suggestive of venous signals in 5 of 25 (20%) general anesthetic cases, which resolved with the application of a pressure dressing.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=25)

Structured PICO

Does venous pulsation affect the forehead pulse oximeter wave form and Spo2 calculation in patients under general anesthesia?

P
Population
25 general anesthetic cases
I
Intervention
Reflective forehead pulse oximeter sensors
O
Outcome
Plethysmographic wave form morphologysurrogate

Venous pulsation can cause complex wave forms in forehead pulse oximeters, potentially leading to erroneously low SpO2 values, which can be corrected with a pressure dressing.

Abstract

In Brief Reflective forehead pulse oximeter sensors have recently been introduced into clinical practice. They reportedly have the advantage of faster response times and immunity to the effects of vasoconstriction. Of concern are reports of signal instability and erroneously low Spo2 values with some of these new sensors. During a study of the plethysmographic wave forms from various sites (finger, ear, and forehead) it was noted that in some cases the forehead wave form became unexpectedly complex in configuration. The plethysmographic signals from 25 general anesthetic cases were obtained, which revealed the complex forehead wave form during 5 cases. We hypothesized that the complex wave form was attributable to an underlying venous signal. It was determined that the use of a pressure dressing over the sensor resulted in a return of a normal plethysmographic wave form. Further examination of the complex forehead wave form reveal a morphology consistent with a central venous trace with atrial, cuspidal, and venous waves. It is speculated that the presence of the venous signal is the source of the problems reported with the forehead sensors. It is believed that the venous wave form is a result of the method of attachment rather than the use of reflective plethysmographic sensors. IMPLICATIONS: Occasionally the forehead pulse oximeter wave form takes on features suggestive of a venous signal rather than the normal arterial signal. It is suggested that this may be a source of error when determining arterial oxygen saturation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shelley et al. (2005) conducted an observational in General anesthesia (n=25). Forehead pulse oximeter sensors was evaluated on Complex forehead wave form (venous signal). Forehead pulse oximeter sensors produced complex wave forms suggestive of venous signals in 5 of 25 (20%) general anesthetic cases, which resolved with the application of a pressure dressing.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a14781332782f386662b150https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000145063.01043.4b
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper