Key result
Positive MSNA responders demonstrated larger total MSNA responses during the first and second minutes of static handgrip (P<0.01 and P<0.0001), despite similar blood pressure increases.
Observational (n=29)
p-value: p=<0.01
MSNA response patterns during the first minute of static handgrip show significant interindividual variability, likely influenced by central command, muscle metaboreflex, and arterial baroreflex loading.
MSNA response variability during handgrip should not yet change practice; leaves open distinct reflex contributions and need for prospective outcome studies.
Negative and positive muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) responders have been observed during mental stress. We hypothesized that similar MSNA response patterns could be identified during the first minute of static handgrip and contribute to the interindividual variability throughout exercise. Supine measurements of multiunit MSNA (microneurography) and continuous blood pressure (Finometer) were recorded in 29 young healthy men during the first (HG1) and second (HG2) minute of static handgrip (30% maximal voluntary contraction) and subsequent postexercise circulatory occlusion (PECO). Responders were identified on the basis of differences from the typical error of baseline total MSNA: 7 negative, 12 positive, and 10 nonresponse patterns. Positive responders demonstrated larger total MSNA responses during HG1 ( P < 0.01) and HG2 ( P < 0.0001); however, the increases in blood pressure throughout handgrip exercise were similar between all groups, as were the changes in heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, total vascular conductance, and respiration (all P > 0.05). Comparing negative and positive responders, total MSNA responses were similar during PECO ( P = 0.17) but opposite from HG2 to PECO (∆40 ± 46 vs. ∆-21 ± 62%, P = 0.04). Negative responders also had a shorter time-to-peak diastolic blood pressure during HG1 (20 ± 20 vs. 44 ± 14 s, P < 0.001). Total MSNA responses during HG1 were associated with responses to PECO ( r = 0.39, P < 0.05), the change from HG2 to PECO ( r = -0.49, P < 0.01), and diastolic blood pressure time to peak ( r = 0.50, P < 0.01). Overall, MSNA response patterns during the first minute of static handgrip contribute to interindividual variability and appear to be influenced by differences in central command, muscle metaboreflex activation, and rate of loading of the arterial baroreflex.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Incognito et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=29). Static handgrip and postexercise circulatory occlusion vs. Interindividual comparison (negative, positive, and nonresponders) was evaluated on Total MSNA responses during the first and second minute of static handgrip (p=<0.01). Positive MSNA responders demonstrated larger total MSNA responses during the first and second minutes of static handgrip (P<0.01 and P<0.0001), despite similar blood pressure increases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: