Key result
Automatic LAT annotation matches manual mapping success but reduces procedure times during PVC ablation.
Why the study?
To evaluate the potential benefits of an automatic local activation time acquisition protocol using wavefront annotation plus ECG pattern matching during PVC ablation procedures.
Does an automatic LAT annotation protocol improve mapping success and procedural efficiency compared to manual annotation in patients undergoing PVC ablation?
RCT (n=100)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Does an automatic LAT annotation protocol improve mapping success and procedural efficiency compared to manual annotation in patients undergoing PVC ablation?
Automatic LAT annotation during PVC ablation significantly reduces mapping and procedure times while maintaining similar mapping and clinical success compared to manual annotation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automatic LAT annotation shortens PVC ablation procedures with similar success; supports wider adoption of automated mapping in electrophysiology.
AIMS: To assess potential benefits of a local activation time (LAT) automatic acquisition protocol using wavefront annotation plus an ECG pattern matching algorithm [automatic (AUT)-arm] during premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective, randomized, controlled, and international multicentre study (NCT03340922). One hundred consecutive patients with indication for PVC ablation were enrolled and randomized to AUT (n = 50) or manual (MAN, n = 50) annotation protocols using the CARTO3 navigation system. The primary endpoint was mapping success. Clinical success was defined as a PVC-burden reduction of ≥80% in the 24-h Holter within 6 months after the procedure. Mean age was 56 ± 14 years, 54% men. The mean baseline PVC burden was 25 ± 13%, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 55 ± 11%. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The most frequent PVC-site of origin were right ventricular outflow tract (41%), LV (25%), and left ventricular outflow tract (17%), without differences between groups. Radiofrequency (RF) time and number of RF applications were similar for both groups. Mapping and procedure times were significantly shorter in the AUT-arm (25.5 ± 14.3 vs. 32.8 ± 12.6 min, P = 0.009; and 54.8 ± 24.8 vs. 67.4 ± 25.2, P = 0.014, respectively), while more mapping points were acquired [136 (94-222) AUT vs. 79 (52-111) MAN; P < 0.001]. Mapping and clinical success were similar in both groups. There were no procedure-related complications. CONCLUSION: The use of a complete automatic protocol for LAT annotation during PVC ablation procedures allows to achieve similar clinical endpoints with higher procedural efficiency when compared with conventional, manual annotation carried out by expert operators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jáuregui et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Premature ventricular complexes (PVC) (n=100). Automatic local activation time annotation (AUT-method) vs. Manual annotation (MAN-method) was evaluated on Mapping success (complete PVC abolition after RF applications at the earliest activation site) (p=0.84). Automatic local activation time annotation achieved similar mapping success (62% vs. 60%) but significantly reduced procedure times compared to manual annotation during PVC ablation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: