Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Educational review demonstrates frameworks for evaluating clinical practice guideline recommendations, highlighting strategies to tailor evidence-based guidance to individual patient care.
CLINICAL SCENARIO At the conclusion of our first article on practice guidelines¹in this series, we left you examining the full text of a practice guideline²that could help you marshal a convincing response to a colleague who disagrees with your approach to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women. Later that day, chatting with another colleague, you mention the disagreement. He shrugs, and avows, "It's entirely a matter of personal preference, the evidence doesn't support either of you." You return to the guideline, looking for how particular recommendations may be justified and adapted to your patient's circumstances. WHAT ARE THE RECOMMENDATIONS? Are Practical, Clinically Important, Recommendations Made? To be useful, recommendations should give practical, unambiguous advice about a specific health problem. For guidelines about managing health conditions, you should determine if the intent is to prevent, screen for, diagnose, treat, or palliate the disorder. For guidelines about
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark C. Wilson (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: