Why the study?
There is currently wide variation in the terminology used for clinical practice recommendations.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
May improve transparency in guideline development; leaves open effects on clinical practice and evidence synthesis.
An evidence-based approach to clinical decision-making for optimizing patient care is desirable because it promotes quality of care, improves patient safety, decreases medical errors, and reduces health care costs. Clinical practice recommendations are systematically developed documents regarding best practice for specific clinical management issues, which can assist care providers in their clinical decision-making. However, there is currently wide variation in the terminology used for such clinical practice recommendations. The aim of this article is to provide guidance to authors, reviewers, and editors on the definitions of terms commonly used for clinical practice recommendations. This is intended to improve transparency and clarity regarding the definitions of these terminologies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joshi et al. (2019) reported a review. This article provides guidance on consistent definitions for clinical practice guidelines, consensus statements, position statements, and practice alerts to improve transparency and clarity.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: