Key result
Extremely low-dose paclitaxel using the Cobra-P DES resulted in similar neointimal obstruction at 4 months compared to low-dose paclitaxel (13.5% vs 10.9%, P=0.276).
Why the study?
Does extremely low-dose paclitaxel-eluting stent improve vessel response compared to low-dose paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions?
Does extremely low-dose paclitaxel-eluting stent improve vessel response compared to low-dose paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions?
Extremely low-dose paclitaxel-eluting stents demonstrate similar neointimal suppression but smaller late-acquired incomplete stent apposition area compared to low-dose stents at 4 months.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for extremely low-dose paclitaxel-eluting stents; prospective randomized trials needed before clinical adoption.
Objective The aim of this first‐in‐man trial was to evaluate vessel response of two doses of the balloon expandable Cobra‐P drug‐eluting coronary stent (DES). Background The Cobra‐P DES system consists of a cobalt chromium alloy with bioabsorbable siloxane sol–gel matrix coating that elutes low dose paclitaxel. Methods A total of 60 lesions (54 patients) were sequentially assigned to extremely low‐dose (group A: 3.7 µg/18 mm; n = 30, 1/33 dose of the TAXUS Liberte) or low‐dose (group B: 8 µg/18 mm; n = 30) arm. Intravascular ultrasound images were obtained at post‐procedure and at 4 months. Results Patient and lesion characteristics were matched between the two groups except for the higher prevalence of men in group B. At 4 months, there were no significant differences in neointimal obstruction (13.5 ± 9.5% vs. 10.9 ± 7.8%, P = 0.276), and maximum cross‐sectional narrowing (31.2 ± 14.3% vs. 28.6 ± 16.1%, P = 0.523) between the two groups. Late‐acquired incomplete stent apposition occurred in four cases in each arm ( P = 1.000). Although the volume of late‐acquired incomplete stent apposition did not differ between the two groups (1.0 ± 0.6 mm 3 vs. 8.6 ± 10.9 mm 3 , P = 0.200), maximum late‐acquired incomplete stent apposition area was significantly smaller in group A than in group B (1.1 ± 0.3 mm 2 vs. 2.5 ± 1.4 mm 2 , P = 0.029). Conclusions In the first‐in‐man study of the Cobra‐P DES, neointimal hyperplasia at 4 months appears to be similar between extremely low‐dose and low‐dose groups. Although the incidence of late‐acquired incomplete stent apposition was similar, the magnitude of the late‐acquired gap between the stent and vessel was greater in the low‐dose group compared with the extremely low‐dose group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakatani et al. (2013) studied De novo coronary lesions (n=54). Cobra-P drug-eluting coronary stent (extremely low-dose paclitaxel) vs. Cobra-P drug-eluting coronary stent (low-dose paclitaxel, 8 µg/18 mm) was evaluated on Neointimal obstruction at 4 months (p=0.276). Extremely low-dose paclitaxel using the Cobra-P DES resulted in similar neointimal obstruction at 4 months compared to low-dose paclitaxel (13.5% vs 10.9%, P=0.276).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: