Key result
Accelerometer use for assessing habitual physical activity in rural heart failure patients was feasible and reliable, with ~50% protocol adherence and high reliability (ICC > 0.879) over 6 months.
Why the study?
Is using an accelerometer a feasible and reliable method to assess habitual physical activity in rural heart failure patients?
Observational (n=100)
No
Is using an accelerometer a feasible and reliable method to assess habitual physical activity in rural heart failure patients?
Accelerometers are a feasible and reliable tool for assessing habitual physical activity in rural heart failure patients over a 6-month period.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support remote PA monitoring in rural HF; leaves open adherence optimization and broader validation before clinical adoption.
(1) Background: Physical inactivity is prevalent in rural heart failure (HF) patients. To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving physical activity (PA), we need an accurate, reliable PA assessment tool that is feasible and acceptable to HF patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility and reliability of using an accelerometer to assess HF patients' PA. (2) Method: A total of 100 HF patients discharged from a rural hospital participated in the study and wore an accelerometer at baseline, 3, and 6 months following discharge. (3) Result: The daily average wear time across all three time points was 15.7 (±3.3) h for weekdays, and 15.8 (±3.7) h for weekends. Approximately 50% of the participants adhered to the device wear protocol at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Factors related to wear time were also examined. Acceptable reliability assessed by intra-class correlation (ICC > 0.879) was found for daily activity calories, activity counts per minutes, and time spent on moderate or greater PA. (4) Conclusion: The present findings suggest that an accelerometer is a feasible and reliable measure of habitual PA in rural HF patients over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Young et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=100). Accelerometer was evaluated on Feasibility (adherence and wear time) and reliability (intra-class correlation) of accelerometer use. Accelerometer use for assessing habitual physical activity in rural heart failure patients was feasible and reliable, with ~50% protocol adherence and high reliability (ICC > 0.879) over 6 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: