Key result
Significant debris was retrieved in 55% of patients undergoing PCI with a distal protection device, occurring more frequently in vein grafts (69%) than native vessels (48%, p=0.006).
Why the study?
What are the clinical and angiographic predictors of significant distal embolization during PCI with a vascular protection device in patients with native vessel or vein graft lesions?
Observational (n=194)
What are the clinical and angiographic predictors of significant distal embolization during PCI with a vascular protection device in patients with native vessel or vein graft lesions?
Absolute Event Rate: 69% vs 48%
p-value: p=0.006
Longer stent length and final TIMI flow <3 predict significant distal embolization during PCI, suggesting that vascular protection devices should be considered when treating long lesions.
Frequent debris in vein graft PCI signals embolization risk; hypothesis-generating for selective distal protection, needs prospective trials.
Objective: We sought to define clinical and angiographic variables that may predict patients and lesions at increased risk for distal embolism during percutaneous intervention (PCI), as assessed by debris retrieval from a distal‐protection filter device. Background: Distal thrombo‐ and atheroembolism may contribute to periprocedural myocardial necrosis during PCI, which may in turn affect long‐term outcomes. Distal protection devices have been used to reduce this occurrence with variable outcomes depending on lesion and patient subsets. Methods: 194 consecutive patients in whom the FilterWire® device (FW) [Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, MA] was used for native coronary vessel (n =129) or vein graft (n = 65) PCI were studied. FW debris was visually analyzed using a semi‐quantitative grading score. Patients with “significant” debris (particles ≥ 1 mm diameter) were compared with those with “nonsignificant” debris (no debris or particles <1 mm) with respect to clinical (age, gender, coronary disease risk factors, clinical presentation, periprocedural medications), and angiographic (vessel treated, vessel size, lesion length, lesion characteristics, angiographic thrombus and TIMI flow before and after PCI) variables. Results: Significant debris was retrieved in 55% of patients, more frequently from vein graft (69%) than native vessel lesions (48%, p = 0.006). No clinical characteristics predicted significant debris retrieval. Angiographic predictors of significant debris by multivariate analysis were longer stent length and final TIMI flow <3 (p = 0.009 and 0.007, respectively). Conclusion: Longer stent length, likely reflecting increased lesion length and plaque burden, predicted significant distal embolism during PCI in native vessel and vein graft lesions, as assessed by debris collected in a distal vascular protection device. This suggests that use of vascular protection devices should be considered during PCI of long lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El‐Jack et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Native vessel and vein graft coronary intervention (n=194). FilterWire device (distal-protection filter) vs. Native vessel lesions was evaluated on Significant debris retrieval (particles ≥ 1 mm diameter) (p=0.006). Significant debris was retrieved in 55% of patients undergoing PCI with a distal protection device, occurring more frequently in vein grafts (69%) than native vessels (48%, p=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: