Key result
An algorithm for automatic measurement of individual QRS onsets and offsets produced estimations of global QRS onset and offset that were within the CSE recommended tolerances.
Why the study?
Does the proposed algorithm accurately determine global QRS onset and offset compared to median reader measurements in the CSE multilead database?
Population
CSE multilead database
Comparison
Method for determining the individual QRS onsets… vs 'median reader' fiducial measurements
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
May aid automated ECG analysis; leaves open prospective clinical validation before routine use.
Does the proposed algorithm accurately determine global QRS onset and offset compared to median reader measurements in the CSE multilead database?
The proposed algorithm successfully estimates global QRS onset and offset within recommended tolerances, offering a reliable automated method for ECG analysis.
Chazal et al. (2002) studied ECG analysis. Algorithm for automatic measurement of QRS onset and offset vs. 'Median reader' fiducial measurements was evaluated on Estimation of global QRS onset and offset. An algorithm for automatic measurement of individual QRS onsets and offsets produced estimations of global QRS onset and offset that were within the CSE recommended tolerances.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: