Key result
The automated QRS complex detection and measurement algorithms achieved ≥96% sensitivity and positive predictivity, with an absolute global QRS duration error of 12 ms compared to expert manual measurement.
Why the study?
Does an automated QRS detection algorithm accurately measure QRS duration in multichannel ECGs of CRT patients compared to expert analysis?
Does an automated QRS detection algorithm accurately measure QRS duration in multichannel ECGs of CRT patients compared to expert analysis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel automated algorithm for multichannel ECGs accurately detects QRS complexes and measures QRS duration in CRT patients, performing comparably to or better than expert manual measurement.
We developed an automated approach for QRS complex detection and QRS duration (QRSd) measurement that can effectively analyze multichannel electrocardiograms (MECGs) acquired during abnormal conduction and pacing in heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients to enable the use of MECGs to characterize cardiac activation in such patients. The algorithms use MECGs acquired with a custom 53-electrode investigational body surface mapping system and were validated using previously collected data from 58 CRT patients. An expert cohort analyzed the same data to determine algorithm accuracy and error. The algorithms: 1) detect QRS complexes; 2) identify complexes of the most prevalent morphology and morphologic outliers; and 3) determine the array-specific (i.e., anterior and posterior) and global QRS complex onsets, offsets, and durations for the detected complexes. The QRS complex detection algorithm had a positive predictivity and sensitivity of ≥96% for complex detection and classification. The absolute QRSd error was 17 ± 14 ms, or 12%, for array-specific QRSd and 12 ± 10 ms, or 8%, for global QRSd. The absolute global QRSd error (12 ms) was less than the interobserver variation in that measurement (15 ± 10 ms). The sensitivity, positive predictivity, and error of the algorithms were similar to the values reported for current state-of-the-art algorithms designed for and limited to simpler data sets and conduction patterns and within the variation found in clinical 12-lead ECG QRSd measurement techniques. These new algorithms permit accurate, real-time analysis of QRS complex features in MECGs in patients with conduction disorders and/or pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Curtin et al. (2018) studied Heart failure and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) (n=58). Automated QRS complex detection and measurement algorithms vs. Expert cohort manual analysis was evaluated on Absolute global QRS duration error (p=<0.01). The automated QRS complex detection and measurement algorithms achieved ≥96% sensitivity and positive predictivity, with an absolute global QRS duration error of 12 ms compared to expert manual measurement.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: