Key result
Fully automated ECG QRS area matches manual assessment for stratifying CRT response.
Why the study?
QRS area offers superior association with CRT response compared to standard criteria, but its assessment was not fully automated and required expert evaluation.
Does a fully automated method for assessing QRS area correlate with manual assessment and predict response to CRT in patients with heart failure?
Cohort (n=864)
Does a fully automated method for assessing QRS area correlate with manual assessment and predict response to CRT in patients with heart failure?
A fully automated method for assessing QRS area from ECG signals is highly correlated with expert manual assessment and equally effective at predicting CRT response, eliminating the need for manual measurement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support automated QRS area for CRT stratification; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment in patients with heart failure and conduction abnormalities. However, a significant number of patients do not respond to CRT. Currently employed criteria for selection of patients for this therapy (QRS duration and morphology) have several shortcomings. QRS area was recently shown to provide superior association with CRT response. However, its assessment was not fully automated and required the presence of an expert. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop a fully automated method for the assessment of vector-cardiographic (VCG) QRS area from electrocardiographic (ECG) signals. METHODS: Pre-implantation ECG recordings (N = 864, 695 left-bundle-branch block, 589 men) in PDF files were converted to allow signal processing. QRS complexes were found and clustered into morphological groups. Signals were converted from 12‑lead ECG to 3‑lead VCG and an average QRS complex was built. QRS area was computed from individual areas in the X, Y and Z leads. Practical usability was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier plots and 5-year follow-up data. RESULTS: The automatically calculated QRS area values were 123 ± 48 μV.s (mean values and SD), while the manually determined QRS area values were 116 ± 51 ms; the correlation coefficient between the two was r = 0.97. The automated and manual methods showed the same ability to stratify the population (hazard ratios 2.09 vs 2.03, respectively). CONCLUSION: The presented approach allows the fully automatic and objective assessment of QRS area values. SIGNIFICANCE: Until this study, assessing QRS area values required an expert, which means both additional costs and a risk of subjectivity. The presented approach eliminates these disadvantages and is publicly available as part of free signal-processing software.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Plešinger et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Heart failure and conduction abnormalities (patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy) (n=864). Fully automated assessment of vector-cardiographic QRS area vs. Manually determined QRS area was evaluated on Ability to stratify the population for response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (HR 2.09). A fully automated method for assessing QRS area from ECG signals demonstrated similar prognostic stratification for cardiac resynchronization therapy response as manual assessment.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: