Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Research suggests that televised debates, which create a rare but valuable environment of cross-cutting exposure, result in partisan reinforcement and polarization. Extending this line of inquiry, the present study aims to provide a more nuanced understanding of debate effects by re-conceptualizing their nature and boundary. Analyses of national survey data collected in two election cycles demonstrate that debate viewing strengthens a voter’s decision-making routine whereby partisan identity informs political opinions. This pattern of partisan reinforcement by debate viewing was observed for both debated and non-debated issues, suggesting that debate effects transcend the context of any given debate. Discussion focuses on electoral and democratic implications of presidential debates.
Keum et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: