Key result
Significant coronary narrowing (>75%) prior to a first MI resulted in milder deterioration of left ventricular ejection fraction compared to nonsignificant narrowing (-10% vs -26%; P=0.001).
Why the study?
Does significant coronary narrowing prior to a first myocardial infarction reduce the deterioration of left ventricular function compared to nonsignificant narrowing?
Cohort (n=41)
Does significant coronary narrowing prior to a first myocardial infarction reduce the deterioration of left ventricular function compared to nonsignificant narrowing?
Absolute Event Rate: -10% vs -26%
p-value: p=0.001
Patients with severe coronary stenosis prior to a first myocardial infarction experience milder deterioration of left ventricular function, likely associated with ischemic preconditioning and better collateral development.
Supports preconditioning hypothesis in severe stenosis; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
To determine whether the initial degree of coronary narrowing prior to a first myocardial infarction (MI) affects left ventricular function, we analyzed paired coronary angiograms and left ventriculography in 41 consecutive MI patients in whom coronary angiography was obtained before and after MI. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to coronary narrowing of the infarct culprit lesion at first angiogram; a significant narrowing group (group S, 15 patients) and a nonsignificant narrowing group (group N, 26 patients). Significant narrowing was defined as more than 75% stenosis of an infarct-related segment in the first angiography and nonsignificant narrowing was less than 50% narrowing. Clinical characteristics were similar in the two groups, with the exception of initial diameter stenosis. LV function was normal in both groups at initial examination. Group S patients had a higher prevalence of angina prior to MI (73% versus 23%; P = 0.001), good collateral development (73% versus 35%; P = 0.02), and non-Q MI (73% versus 27%; P = 0.004) than group N patients. RWM was also superior in group S compared with group N. The deterioration of global and infarction zone function was mild in group S compared with group N (group S; median EF -10%, RWM -0.27 SD/chord, group N; median EF -26%, RWM -1.62 SD/chord, P = 0.001). We conclude that deterioration of LV wall motion in patients with severe stenosis in their initial stenosis would be milder than in AMI that developed from a mild degree of stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamagami et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in First myocardial infarction (n=41). Significant coronary narrowing (>75% stenosis) vs. Nonsignificant coronary narrowing (<50% stenosis) was evaluated on Deterioration of global left ventricular function (median EF change) (p=0.001). Significant coronary narrowing (>75%) prior to a first MI resulted in milder deterioration of left ventricular ejection fraction compared to nonsignificant narrowing (-10% vs -26%; P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: