Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
N EARLY three hundred years ago (1669) in his book Tractus de Corde, Richard Lower offered the first detailed description of the muscular anatomy of the ventricle.l* His drawings show separate overlapping layers, rather like the layers of an onion, each layer consisting of differently directed muscle fibers. Since his day, many anatomists, perhaps most definitively Mall,3 have repeated his dissec- tions and have altered his schemata only in details. As a result, today the illustrations of ventricular myocardial architecture in all anat- omy textbooks are essentially elaborations of Lower's original drawings. Yet, for generations, medical students (and more recently cardiac surgeons) have compared with dismay the textbook illustrations of the heart with the organ they hold in their hands, for no such layers are to be seen. It is ironic that Lower, who did so much in his day to liberate medi- cine from medieval dogma, should himself be the origin of a dogma for later generations.
Robert P. Grant (Sun,) studied this question.