Key result
Non-PV ATA is linked to ~9-fold higher ATA recurrence post-ablation, worsened by high pulmonary pressure.
Why the study?
Little evidence had been reported regarding repeat pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and non-pulmonary vein atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) ablation following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
Does the presence of non-PV ATA and subsequent non-PV ATA ablation affect ATA recurrence compared to repeat PVI alone in patients without non-PV ATA?
Cohort (n=49)
Does the presence of non-PV ATA and subsequent non-PV ATA ablation affect ATA recurrence compared to repeat PVI alone in patients without non-PV ATA?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High pulmonary arterial systolic pressure is associated with non-pulmonary vein atrial tachyarrhythmia triggers in patients with recurrent AF, and repeat PVI alone yields high success in those without non-PV triggers.
Recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is often associated with the recovery of conduction into previously isolated pulmonary veins (PVs). Little evidence concerning repeat PV isolation (PVI) and non-PV ATA ablation has been reported. This study aimed to explore the clinical outcome of recurrent ATA ablation after PVI and the difference between patients with and without non-PV ATA.A total of 49 patients without structural heart diseases who received catheter ablation for recurrent AF between January 2014 and December 2018 were recruited (prior ablation with PVI only 71.4% and PVI with cavotricuspid isthmus line ablation 28.6%). Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of non-PV ATA.Most patients (53.1%) experienced very late recurrence with a median duration of 15 months. A total of 15 patients had non-PV ATA and received non-PV ATA ablation whereas 34 patients received only repeat PVI for reconnected PVs. A higher pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) was associated with non-PV ATA (odds ratio: 1.161; 95% confidence interval: 1.021-1.321; P = 0.023). During 4.7 ± 1 months, 4/15 (26.7%) and 1/34 (2.9%) patients with and without non-PV ATA, respectively, had ATA recurrence (P = 0.011). The cumulative incidence of ATA recurrence after repeat ablation was significantly lower in patients without non-PV ATA (P = 0.013).In our study, a high PASP was associated with non-PV ATA in patients with recurrent AF. Repeat PVI had a high rate of maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients without non-PV ATA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Recurrent atrial fibrillation (n=49). Presence of non-PV ATA (non-PV ATA ablation) vs. Absence of non-PV ATA (repeat PVI only) was evaluated on ATA recurrence (p=0.011). Patients with non-PV ATA undergoing ablation had higher ATA recurrence than those without non-PV ATA (26.7% vs 2.9%, P=0.011), and higher pulmonary arterial pressure was a risk factor (OR 1.161).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: