Key result
AT recurrence after PFA is linked to absent PV reconnections compared to AF recurrence.
Why the study?
Pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation for AF is increasingly widespread, but the characteristics of atrial tachycardia recurrence after PFA remain unclear.
What are the characteristics and outcomes of atrial tachycardia recurrence compared to atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulsed field ablation?
Observational (n=60)
What are the characteristics and outcomes of atrial tachycardia recurrence compared to atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulsed field ablation?
After PFA-based PVI, AT recurrence is characterized by lower PV reconnection rates and macro-reentrant circuits remote from the PVs, underscoring the importance of tailored mapping and ablation strategies during repeat procedures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AT recurrence after PFA PVI may signal non-PV substrates; leaves open whether tailored repeat ablation improves outcomes in prospective studies.
Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using pulsed field ablation (PFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is becoming increasingly widespread. However, characteristics of atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence after PFA remain unclear. We aimed to investigate characteristics of AT recurrence in comparison with AF recurrence after PFA‐based PVI. Methods We analyzed 60 consecutive patients who underwent repeat ablation for recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia after initial PVI alone performed with a pentaspline PFA system. Patients were classified into an AT group (at least one AT episode before repeat ablation) and an AF group (AF recurrence only). Baseline characteristics, pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections, and recurrence‐free rate after repeat ablation procedure were assessed. Results The AT group consisted of 34 patients (57%). In the multivariate analysis, absence of PV reconnections was independently associated with AT recurrence ( p = 0.037). All mappable ATs were macro‐reentrant circuits and none were directly related to PVs. Recurrence‐free rate after repeat ablation did not differ between AT and AF groups ( p = 0.277). However, patients presenting in AT at the beginning of the repeat procedure had the most favorable outcomes, whereas those in AF had the poorest ( p = 0.042). Conclusions After PFA‐based PVI, AT recurrence was characterized by lower PV reconnection rates and macro‐reentrant circuits remote from the PVs, whereas AF recurrence was more frequently associated with PV reconnections. While overall outcomes after repeat ablation were comparable, baseline rhythm at the repeat procedure was associated with prognosis, underscoring the importance of tailored mapping and ablation strategies after PFA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ukita et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia after pulsed field ablation (n=60). Atrial tachycardia recurrence vs. Atrial fibrillation recurrence only was evaluated on Absence of pulmonary vein reconnections (p=0.037). Atrial tachycardia recurrence after pulsed field ablation was independently associated with the absence of pulmonary vein reconnections (p=0.037) compared to atrial fibrillation recurrence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: