Key result
Virtual FFR demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy versus measured FFR for moderate lesions in ACS.
Why the study?
Identifying physiologically significant lesions during invasive management of ACS remains challenging, while invasive pressure wire assessment is often not feasible.
Does virtual (computed) fractional flow reserve (vFFR) accurately assess physiological lesion severity compared to invasive FFR in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Does virtual (computed) fractional flow reserve (vFFR) accurately assess physiological lesion severity compared to invasive FFR in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Virtual FFR offers a rapid, less invasive alternative to pressure-wire FFR with high diagnostic accuracy, potentially streamlining physiological assessment of moderate coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes.
The current management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is with an invasive strategy to guide treatment. However, identifying the lesions which are physiologically significant can be challenging. Non-invasive imaging is generally not appropriate or timely in the acute setting, so the decision is generally based upon visual assessment of the angiogram, supplemented in a small minority by invasive pressure wire studies using fractional flow reserve (FFR) or related indices. Whilst pressure wire usage is slowly increasing, it is not feasible in many vessels, patients and situations. Limited evidence for the use of FFR in non-ST elevation (NSTE) ACS suggests a 25% change in management, compared with traditional assessment, with a shift from more to less extensive revascularisation. Virtual (computed) FFR (vFFR), which uses a 3D model of the coronary arteries constructed from the invasive angiogram, and application of the physical laws of fluid flow, has the potential to be used more widely in this situation. It is less invasive, fast and can be integrated into catheter laboratory software. For severe lesions, or mild disease, it is probably not required, but it could improve the management of moderate disease in 'real time' for patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), and in bystander disease in ST elevation myocardial infarction. Its practicability and impact in the acute setting need to be tested, but the underpinning science and potential benefits for rapid and streamlined decision-making are enticing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haley et al. (2021) conducted a review in Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS). Virtual (Computed) Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) vs. Measured Fractional Flow Reserve (mFFR) / Coronary Angiography was evaluated. Virtual fractional flow reserve (vFFR) is a rapid, non-invasive technique that demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy compared to measured FFR and has the potential to improve real-time decision-making for moderate lesions in acute coronary syndromes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: