Why the study?
Does fractional flow reserve (FFR) or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) assessment guide revascularization effectively in acute coronary syndromes?
Does fractional flow reserve (FFR) or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) assessment guide revascularization effectively in acute coronary syndromes?
This review highlights the evolving role and evidence base for physiological lesion assessment using FFR and iFR to guide revascularization in acute coronary syndromes.
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment provides anatomical and physiological information that is often used to tailor treatment strategies in coronary artery disease. Whilst robust data validates FFR use in stable ischaemic heart disease, its use in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is less well investigated. We critically review the current data surrounding FFR use across the spectrum of ACS including culprit and non-culprit artery analysis. With adenosine being conventionally used to induce maximal hyperaemia during FFR assessment, co-existent clinical conditions may preclude its use during acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, we include a current review of instantaneous wave free ratio as a novel vasodilator independent method of assessing lesion severity as an alternative strategy to guide revascularisation in ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: