Why the study?
There are few data revealing the degree of microvascular bed injury and vasodilator capacity in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Does the measurement of coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) improve prognostic assessment in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Does the measurement of coronary flow reserve (CFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) improve prognostic assessment in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
CFR and FFR assessment after reperfusion in ACS may offer prognostic insights into microvascular injury and tissue lysis.
The methods used to appreciate the degree of coronary stenosis such as CFR and FFR, come to complement the coronary angiography and help the interventional physician during PCI. Furthermore, CFR and FFR measured immediately after reperfusion, in patients with ACS, may act as a prognosis factor for myocardial infarction.Changes in coronary microcirculation in patients with ACS and NSTEMI correlate to the degree and extent of tissue lysis processes.So far, there are few data revealing the degree of microvascular bed injury and vasodilator capacity in patients with acute myocardial infarction. In this article, we will refer to some studies in the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tarita et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: