Key result
Intravenous iron replacement significantly reduced the odds of heart failure hospitalization (OR 0.44) compared to placebo in heart failure patients with iron deficiency.
Why the study?
Findings on the effects of iron on heart failure hospitalizations and mortality among patients with iron deficiency and heart failure remained conflicting across different studies.
Does intravenous iron therapy reduce heart failure hospitalization and all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,261)
Yes
Does intravenous iron therapy reduce heart failure hospitalization and all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency?
Effect estimate: OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.78)
Absolute Event Rate: 22.1% vs 37.6%
p-value: p=0.005
Intravenous iron therapy in heart failure patients with iron deficiency significantly reduces heart failure hospitalizations and improves functional status and ejection fraction, though it does not significantly affect all-cause mortality.
Findings on the effects of iron on heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and mortality among patients with iron deficiency (ID) and HF remain conflicting across different studies. We performed a meta-analysis of clinical trials assessing the clinical, hematic and cardiovascular benefits of treating ID in HF patients. We completed a systematic search for studies comparing IV iron to placebo in HF patients with ID. The primary outcomes were rates of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included change in hematic values, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and ejection fraction. We applied a random-effects model with planned sensitivity analyses of studies with skewed effect sizes. Nine studies were included with a total of 2,261 patients. Analysis revealed that treatment of HF patients with IV iron replacement significantly reduced the odds of HF hospitalization (odds ratio (OR): 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24 to 0.78; p=0.005, I2=67%),) but did not significantly impact all-cause mortality compared to placebo (OR: 0.89; 95%, CI: 0.67 to 1.19; p=0.44, I2: 0%). Analysis showed that IV iron treatment group had significantly higher serum ferritin, transferrin saturation and hemoglobin (Hb) levels. They also had lower NYHA class -1.90 (95% CI (-2.91 to -0.89); p<0.001, I2:89%) with higher ejection fraction 0.50 (95% CI (0.09 to 0.90) p=0.016, I2:86%). Treatment with IV iron in HF patients with ID is associated with a significant reduction of HF hospitalization but no effects on all-cause mortality. There were also significant increases in hematic values and ejection fraction with a reduction in NYHA class.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogugua et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart Failure with Iron Deficiency (n=2,261). Intravenous (IV) iron vs. Placebo was evaluated on Heart failure hospitalization (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.78, p=0.005). Intravenous iron replacement significantly reduced the odds of heart failure hospitalization (OR 0.44) compared to placebo in heart failure patients with iron deficiency.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: