Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve outcomes in patients with coexisting atrial fibrillation and chronic heart failure?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve outcomes in patients with coexisting atrial fibrillation and chronic heart failure?
This review outlines the prognostic relevance of atrial fibrillation in heart failure and the effects and strategies of cardiac resynchronization therapy in this patient population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No clinical trial data on CRT in AF-HF; leaves open whether therapy improves outcomes.
Atrial fibrillation and chronic heart failure are two major and even growing cardiovascular conditions that often coexist. Cardiac resynchronization therapy is an important, device-based, non-pharmacological approach in a selected group of chronic heart failure patients that has been shown to improve left ventricular function and to reduce both morbidity and mortality in large randomized trials. The latest European and American guidelines have considered atrial fibrillation patients with heart failure eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy. This review summarizes current literature concerning the following topics: prognostic relevance of atrial fibrillation in heart failure, effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in atrial fibrillation, relevance and strategies of rhythm and rate control in this group of patients. Authors explain how atrial fibrillation may interfere with the delivery of adequate cardiac resynchronization therapy, how to reduce the burden of atrial tachyarrhythmias, and finally present a brief overview.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mihálcz et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: